Dating direc t

But when this admission of fault occurs, it often accompanies the introduction of a new and supposedly superior dating technique.The problem is that the new technique has in the end always proven to be unreliable.For example, in the 1940s the U-Th-He method was used.But these tests quickly became notoriously unreliable, as they indicated so many different "ages" for the same rock layer.

It is rare that a weakness in the "millions of years" dating of earth materials is ever mentioned in standard earth science publications.Three geologists have reported what they called the first "successful" direct dating of dinosaur bone.Will this new radioisotope dating (or radiodating) technique solve the problems that plagued older dating methods?It refers to results that were supposedly thrown off by isotopes added to or subtracted from a sample over time. But the fission tracks' microscopic scars, left in igneous rocks from decaying radioactive atoms, were eventually seen rock-altering event involving hot water.But again, since nobody was there to observe these events, this could just as well be another excuse used to explain away confusing dating results.The DATE service is available 24 hours a day, Monday through Friday.


Leave a Reply