In this FAQ, I will be attacking not steel men but what as far as I can tell are actual Reactionary positions.
Some of them seem really dumb to me and I excluded them from the previous piece, but they make it in here. In particular, the movement seems to be divided between those who want a feudal/aristocratic monarchy, those who want an absolute monarchy, and those who want some form of state-as-corporation.
Neoreaction is a political ideology supporting a return to traditional ideas of government and society, especially traditional monarchy and an ethno-nationalist state.
0.3: Are you going to treat Reaction and Progressivism as real things? One of the problems in exercises like this is how much to take political labels seriously.This document needs extensive revision to stay fair and correct, but such revision is currently lower priority than other major projects.Until then, I apologize for any inaccuracies or misrepresentations.] This is the Anti-Reactionary FAQ.It is meant to rebut some common beliefs held by the political movement called Reaction or Neoreaction.0.1: What are the common beliefs of the political movement called Reaction or Neoreaction?Michael is also quite smart, very prolific, and best of all for my purposes unusually willing to state Reactionary theories plainly and explicitly in so many words and detail the evidence that he thinks supports them.